Anti-Spam Research Group Discussion Archive - Date Index

• Aug 26 2003
• RE: [Asrg] 4. Consent Framework - General, Andrew Akehurst
• [Asrg] Re: Thank you!, nazgul
• Re: [Asrg] 2.a.1 Analysis of Actual Spam Data - next steps (reflection), Kurt Magnusson
• Re: [Asrg] DRIP Milter (take tres), Richard Rognlie
• RE: [Asrg] 4. Consent Framework - General, gep2
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, waltdnes
• RE: [Asrg] 4d. Consent Framework - Protocols and Formats, Pete - Madscientist
• [Asrg] DRIP Milter (take two), Richard Rognlie
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Brad Knowles
• RE: [Asrg] 4. Consent Framework - General, Pete - Madscientist
• RE: [Asrg] 0. - General - Consent and SoBig, Sauer, Damon
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Bart Schaefer
• [Asrg] 0. General - Welcome to the ASRG, Yakov Shafranovich
• Aug 25 2003
• Re: 7. BCP - Default Settings (was Re: [Asrg] 0. - General -Consent andSoBig), gep2
• Re: [Asrg] 0. - General - Announcing Yakov Shafranovich as co-chair of ASRG, Yakov Shafranovich
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Alan DeKok
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Dave Crocker
• RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list, Bob Wyman
• RE: [Asrg] 0. - General - Consent and SoBig, Eric Dean
• RE: [Asrg] 0. - General - Announcing Yakov Shafranovich as co-chair of ASRG, Eric Dean
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Brad Knowles
• RE: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Christopher Bird
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Bill Cole
• Re: [Asrg] MXs Used As Authentication - Why RMX?, Peter J. Holzer