Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal

[Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>]

> if >99% of recipients want to receive the
> > messages, the sender is in some sense "legitimate".  if <1% want to
> > receive the message, the sender is a "spammer".  
> 
> This puts the definition of spam in terms of quantity though. So you
> can end up with a targetted spammer sending something to a small
> number of people, all who think its interesting and useful, yet its
> bulk and unsollicited. 

then it doesn't create a problem for anyone, and we shouldn't be trying
to declare that illigitimate.

> I don't like legitimising that, and I know I'm not alone in that. 

you have nothing to say about it - you were not involved.

Keith
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg