Re: [Asrg] Spam detection system proposal

["David F. Skoll" <dfs@roaringpenguin.com>]

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Vernon Schryver wrote:

> No, by your own numbers, that's empirically suggested for only 20% of spam.

A cheap test that stops 20% of spam is good.

If you're looking for a single approach that stops most spam, forget
it.

We are facing a tough battle that will take lots of tools and techniques,
each of which stops a bit of spam.  With luck, in concert, we'll be able
to stop "most" spam, where "most" means enough that it's worth doing.

--
David.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg