[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

evaluating with the additional requirements (Re: [Asrg] requirements for a proposed solution + notion of conse nt)



Damon Sauer proposed some more requirements, let's add 3 of those as
k,l,m:

k) should have minimal cost of implementation
l) should require no more horsepower
m) should not significantly increase time to delivery

and look at RMX plus fixed DNS:

	l,m

does not have k (depending on what your ideas of minimal cost are)

and Bayesian filters + hashcash + whitelists:

	m

does not have k (depending on what your ideas of minimal cost are)

horsepower depends on how you deploy it: if only clients create
hashcash shouldn't be a problem; if deployed on servers say in
corporate networks at the gateway, that might cost them some
horsepower (though white lists help that).  But I guess that would be
a trade-off -- the cost of deploying hashcash creation on clients vs
the cost of just doing it at the gateway.

Adam
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg