Re: [Asrg] Random thought

["Alan DeKok" <aland@freeradius.org>]

Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> wrote:
> I think such potential barriers are simply too high.  If a defense
> depends on at least X% of the net using it to reduce your spam load
> by X% for any X greater than 0.01%, then it is hopeless.  You will
> not use it unless you invented it or are selling it and it will never
> be adopted by X% of the net.

  Let's turn a problem into a solution.

  Is there a critical percentage of the net which will cause/force
wide-spread adoption of an anti-spam method?  If so, who are they, and
what percentage of the net do they control?

  Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg