RE: [Asrg] Rejecting Email

["Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com>]

On Monday, March 31, 2003 11:50 PM, Steven F Siirila [SMTP:sfs@tc.umn.edu] 
wrote:
8<...>8
> I was just pointing out that we don't "refuse to listen to them".
> In fact, we occasionally get questions posed to our mail administration
> address (apparently from those that don't go past the first URL) asking
> why we are blocking them.  That address never blocks mail, of course.
>
> However, I do understand your point.  Every site will have differing
> requirements when it comes to blocking/filtering mail.  It is precisely
> this reason that sites should have available one or more configurable
> solutions at their disposal.  There is no one-size-fits-all that I can see
> at this time.

Should sites that block/filter, etc. include a 'standardized' link to a 
statement of policy or 'reason' description for blocking the message?  Of 
course we do have the abuse@ address [RFC2142] that is defined for CRM but what 
if there were also a standard address or 'link' to policy descriptions for 
blocking/filtering behavior?  This is not an proposal for a standard message 
but a standard Location: for such a message.

-e
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg