Re: False Positive -was- RE: [Asrg] Fwd: Returned mail: see transcript for details

[Matt Sergeant <msergeant@startechgroup.co.uk>]

On Wednesday, Apr 2, 2003, at 21:56 Europe/London, Jim Youll wrote:

> I love statistics, but is it possible that not-spam could be possibly 
> called "not spam" rather than "ham" in the research-and-report 
> context? The word "spam" creates enough difficulty on its own without 
> adding another "zany techie word."
"Ham" is in very common use now in the anti-spam community. I don't see 
any valid reason to stop using it.

Matt.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg