[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Spam Control Complexity -- scaling, adoption, diversit y and scenarios [evidence for legal actions]

Dave Crocker wrote:


[...]
For this group to spend time on anything other than networking-based
technical solution paths is seriously inappropriate, except to the
extend that study of related issues helps the group do its networking
work.
e.g. making MTAs record bounces to non existing local addresses may help in legal actions against "sender faking" spammers.

It woul require MTA to reject messages from <> to non existing local recipient in reply to "final dot" insted of reply to RCPT TO: => bounce but keep for possible legal action

[I suggested it some time ago in news:comp.mail.sendmail ]

> [...]

--
Andrzej [pl>en: Andrew] Adam Filip http://www.polbox.com/a/anfi/



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg