Re: [Asrg] A New Plan for No Spam / Velocity Indicator

["Mark Delany" <tcrcn-6ugsc@qmda.emu.st>]

On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 10:02:04AM -0700, J C Lawrence allegedly wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:32:39 +0100 
> Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com> wrote:
> 
> >> My native suspicion is that RCPT TO bundling is going to have to go.
> >> Certainly for my own systems I'm more or less compleatly disabled it
> >> via outbound rewriting via TMDA which unrolls any RCPT TO bundles
> >> (only hold out is Mailman, and that only until I upgrade to 2.1 and
> >> VERP).
> 
> > That's a shame, particularly given that the RFCs require that I must
> > accept 100 rcpts.
> 
> Oh, I don't think it will be removed from the SMTP spec, but that
> implementation of consent mechanisms will have the side effect of
> causing single RCPT TO per message.

Why? Couldn't consent information be sent as part of the RCPT TO:
using the <rcpt-parameters> as defined in RFC2821?

MAIL FROM: <legitbulker@legit.domain>
RCPT TO: <user1@your.domain> permission-given=blah1
RCPT TO: <user2@your.domain> permission-given=blah blah


Regards.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg