RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium

["Eric D. Williams" <eric@infobro.com>]

Aye, I agree.

On Sunday, May 04, 2003 7:11 PM, Kee Hinckley [SMTP:nazgul@somewhere.com] wrote:
> At 12:39 PM -0400 5/4/03, Eric D. Williams wrote:
> >no protocol interaction.  There are some I suspect who would argue that all
> >'spaminess' must be detected in the SMTP transactions (and that has 
> >advantages)
> 
> Given that two different people may consider the same list to be, or 
> not be, spam.  And that it is not always possible to determine the 
> final recipient at the SMTP transaction point, I think it's pretty 
> clear that this isn't possible.
> -- 
> Kee Hinckley
> http://www.messagefire.com/          Junk-Free Email Filtering
> http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/   Writings on Technology and Society
> 
> I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
> responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
> everyone else's.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg