Re: RE: [Asrg] RMX proposals and Nash Equilibrium

["Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com>]

> At 12:39 PM -0400 5/4/03, Eric D. Williams wrote:
> >no protocol interaction. There are some I suspect who would argue that
> all
> >'spaminess' must be detected in the SMTP transactions (and that has 
> >advantages)
> 
> 
> Given that two different people may consider the same list to be, or 
> not be, spam.  And that it is not always possible to determine the 
> final recipient at the SMTP transaction point, I think it's pretty 
> clear that this isn't possible.
> -- 

It's clear that this isn't possible for ALL SMTP transactions. It clearly
IS possible for some. Control of MTA-based filtering by an end-user will
clearly
give advantages (appropriate negative responses, more meaningful positive
ones) in a large proportion (I'd guess a large majority) of cases.







--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg