Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article

[David Walker <antispam@grax.com>]

No disrespect was intended.  The silly quotes were not meant to refer to 
anything you said but to be a general, while sarcastic, summary of the list's 
response to RMX and similar schemes.

On Tuesday 06 May 2003 10:54 am, Dave Crocker wrote:
> David,
>
> When you are summarizing comments from others, please make some effort
> to reflect what they actually said.  Re-casting their statements into a
> form that is silly and false is not especially constructive.
>
> d/
>
> DW> The reason RMX records haven't made a big impact to date is the lack of
> a DW> standard.  On this list there have been numerous proposals, each
> slightly DW> different and each one has been met with silly arguments like
> "if we do that DW> I won't be able to send anonymous e-mails pretending to
> be Ronald Reagan" or, DW> more realistically, "but then I'd have to send my
> hotmail messages actually DW> through the hotmail service and that would
> suck"
>
> DW> On Monday 05 May 2003 04:27 pm, Dave Crocker wrote:
> >> an explanation of the real utility of rmx records has, so far, been
> >> based on assumptions and assertions that run contrary to the user and
> >> operations history of the Internet.
>
> --
>  Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
>  Sunnyvale, CA  USA <tel:+1.408.246.8253>, <fax:+1.866.358.5301>


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg