Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article

[Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>]

On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 11:28:11AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> Ident asks the owner (root) of the associated IP address for some
> identification information and assumes that the requestor then knows
> something that is both accurate and important.  The assumption is
> incorrect, possibly on both counts.

Sorry, but that's nonsense. "accurate" and "important" are terms of
your phantasy, but not of network security and not of RMX.



> RMX asks the owner of the domain about a purported relationship to some
> other domain, and assumes that is is both accurate and important.


A relationship to some other domains? 

That's bullshit. You're confusing everything. Are you stoned?




> Does use of RMX mean that the sending MTA has authorized the From field
> domain name?  Perhaps.

The sending MTA has authorized the From field? 

Do you have any clue at all what you are talking about? 




> But a rogue spammer who owns an MTA is free to list whatever other
> domain names it wants in the RMX.  So nasty-spammer.com is free to have
> an RMX entry for aol.com.


That's pure nonsense. Do you intentionally refuse to understand 
even the simplest things? 

aol.com will not list that MTA in the aol.com RMX entry. The spammer
does not have any chance to list. MTAs do not "list".

You're talking crap. It's the domain owner who authorizes the MTA (or not).




Several people asked you several times to read the draft. You refuse
to inform yourself what RMX is, but you insist on flooding that
mailing list with nonsense and objections without substance.  What is 
your intention?


Hadmut
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg