RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article

["Bob Atkinson" <bobatk@exchange.microsoft.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asrg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:asrg-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Eric D.
> Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 1:34 PM
> To: 'Vernon Schryver'; asrg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article
> 
> It introduces the possibility for "additional" mis-configuration, as
does
> RMX.
>  The point is that an IP address, I think, SHOULD have only one
canonical
> name.

I find this odd: IP addresses with which I am familiar routinely have
many names that resolve to the address: they serve many web domains, for
example, or send and receive mail on behalf of several domains. I don't
understand which of these several domains could reasonably be considered
more equal than others and thus the ONE such canonical name.

	Bob

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg