Re: [Asrg] seeking comments on new RMX article

["Alan DeKok" <aland@freeradius.org>]

Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> wrote:
> Doesn't that style of rhetoric voilate the IETF's rules?   Mr. Danisch
> has used it repeatedly since he subscribed to this mailing list.  

  I would suggest, Vernon, that you improve your own behaviour before
you complain about others.  The past few days has seen a spate of ad
hominem attacks by you, along with overt attempts to put words into
other peoples mouths, and then attacking them for your own inventions.

> Regardless of the offical response, I wish Dave Crocker and others
> would reward such behavior more appropriately, with complete silence.

  There has already been official response on Dave's behaviour.  Dave
has apparently ignored that response.  I wait for it to escalate.

  My involvement here has been naive, I must admit.  I had hoped that
I could honestly address technical concerns I had about solutions
proposed by others, and that other would honestly address technical
concerns about solutions I proposed.  While that has occasionally
happened, the people I would label "con" have made a habit out of
quietly ignoring any arguments they find difficult, among other
unproductive behaviours.

  I'm strongly of the opinion that I should give up on ASRG and go
away, as the people opposing ANY solution will never agree to let ASRG
be productive.  Alternately, I would recommend to the IRTF that people
who are unwilling to accept any changes to the network be made
unwelcome in ASRG.

  Alan DeKok.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg