[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners,so what?

To: Asrg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners,so what?
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:27:43 -0500
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:

2. I personally don't think the whois:43 and similar publication systems have
utility in this space.

Leaving whois and registrar cost models aside, In your opinion do registars at all have any utility regarding the spam problem?
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
  - From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
Next by Date: RE: [Asrg] Seeking volunteers for C/R documents (was: Washington Post: Earthlink to Deploy a Challenge-Response System for )
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners,so what?
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Assume perfect knowledge by domain registry provisioners, so what?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread