>> Issues like this: >> http://www.toyz.org/SpamArrestSpams.html >> >> Summary: Alleges SpamArrest harvests sender addresses > >I see privacy issues for challenge/response systems, but that's not >one. Perhaps I should have said "data protection" (as we call it in the UK). >Ths SpamArrest abuse is a potential problem in any system where >you let a third party with handle your mail. It is a consideration >in any system where that involves asking a third party anything about >mail, including DNS blacklists. > Of course the *sender* isn't aware (in advance) that this particular 3rd party is handling the mail. > >I think any spam filtering RFC ought to have a section on privacy >like the required section on security. > That would be nice. No negative privacy impact is a "requirement". I think we had a fairly good consensus on the Requirements...
|
Hi Jon Can you produce the normal spreadsheet of the blackcatsmail users please? It seems that this is a regular request at the start of every month
Regards Bernie Friery Web Development Manager =============================== Connect Internet Solutions Ltd Phone +44 (0)151 794 6699 Fax +44 (0)151 794 8233
|
--