RE: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1

["Eric Dean" <eric@purespeed.com>]

Excellent, these are all good points.  I'll take the lead on compiling a
framework that includes components provided.  I'll probably start with a
simple Table of Contents.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asrg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:asrg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Jon
> Kyme
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: ASRG
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] C/R Thoughts: Take 1
>
>
> >> Issues like this:
> >> http://www.toyz.org/SpamArrestSpams.html
> >>
> >> Summary: Alleges SpamArrest harvests sender addresses
> >
> >I see privacy issues for challenge/response systems, but that's not
> >one.
>
> Perhaps I should have said "data protection" (as we call it in the UK).
>
>
> >Ths SpamArrest abuse is a potential problem in any system where
> >you let a third party with handle your mail.  It is a consideration
> >in any system where that involves asking a third party anything about
> >mail, including DNS blacklists.
> >
>
> Of course the *sender* isn't aware (in advance) that this particular
> 3rd party is handling the mail.
>
>
>
> >
> >I think any spam filtering RFC ought to have a section on privacy
> >like the required section on security.
> >
>
> That would be nice.  No negative privacy impact is a "requirement".
> I think we had a fairly good consensus on the
> Requirements...
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg