Re: [Asrg] Another criteria for "what is spam"...

[Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>]

On June 4, 2003 at 20:29 research@solidmatrix.com (Yakov Shafranovich) wrote:
 > At 07:23 PM 6/4/2003 -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
 > 
 > 
 > >At this point if we could just get rid of the spamming which is best
 > >characterized by its illegal/gray-area behavior I suspect the problem
 > >would become much more manageable even if not completely solved.
 > >[..]
 > 
 > Would you nevertheless agree that UBE that is not sent using "llegal and/or 
 > ethically questionable methods" would still be considered spam?

But of course, and I'd go further and say that's still a small subset
because create a static-free, approved channel to literally hundreds
of millions of eyeballs and you'll see the "U" in "UBE" stretched like
a yoga convention.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202        | Login: 617-739-WRLD
The World              | Public Access Internet     | Since 1989     *oo*
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg