RE: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list

["Peter Kay" <peter@titankey.com>]

IMHO: as an a holder of a anti-spam patent pending, I think its best to
let IPR holders approach us. Otherwise you put yourself in the
unenviable position of "authority" on patents. If you just say "these
are the IPR claims that have been submitted to us" that makes it clean
and simple, not to mention easy to maintain.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:research@solidmatrix.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:51 AM
> To: Asrg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] US Spam patents: Partial list
> 
> 
> At 09:56 PM 6/10/2003 -0400, Bob Wyman wrote:
> >[..]
> >     My motivation for presenting the list is, in part, to 
> demonstrate
> > that the task of producing an exhaustive listing of 
> spam-related IPR is 
> > going to be much more work than it may seem. Frankly, I 
> think we're going 
> > to have to rely on the existing IETF procedures for IPR 
> holders filing of 
> > IPR disclosures...
> >
> >  [..]
> 
> Based on Bob's comments above, is there a need for us to 
> maintain a list 
> such as one that I have 
> (http://www.solidmatrix.com/research/asrg/asrg-ipr.html)? Or 
> should we wait 
> until the IPR holders approach us?
> 
> Yakov
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
> 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg