Re: [Asrg] ASRG IPR policy (was RE: US Spam patents: Partial list )

[Vern Paxson <vern@icir.org>]

> If this is a research organization it does not make sense to require an
> undertaking to require release of IPR before the utility of the proposal in
> question is examined.
> ...
> There is no point in approaching an IPR owner to ask for a license before
> you have decided whether you are even going to use it at all, let alone what
> you are going to do.

But that's not the requirement.  The requirement is to disclose knowledge
of the existence of IPR, not to try to secure a license to it.

Given that, do you still disagree with the requirement?

		Vern
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg