Re: [Asrg] 7. Best Practices - DNSBLs - Article

[Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>]

At 9:21 PM -0400 2003/09/07, Chris Lewis wrote:

>  For example, I can tell you that 2.5% of the email that got through
>  would have been caught except for latency delays in our BLs... ;-)
	Do you know what the latency delays are?  For example, if you 
implemented greylisting and enforced a minimum 30 minute delay before 
you allowed them to get through the greylist, for what percentage of 
these messages would that 30 minute delay have been enough for them 
to show up on the BLs?

	Have you incorporated tools like DCC or Razor into your 
methodology?  Do you know how greylisting with a minimum delay time 
(e.g., 30 minutes) would effect DCC and/or Razor, in terms of their 
efficiency?

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg