As I mentioned in my other post, someone needs to at least figure out how many of these proposals are there, and compile a list of authors.
Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
I agree with Claus.
SPAM is a very serious problem and needs to be addressed ASAP.
Final work from ASRG may take some long time.
It could be interesting to have some kind of solution working soon.
RMX seems to solve many problems and drastically reduce spam without changing too much existing standards. So, it can be deployed in less time than others.
As long as SPAM is nowadays a very serious problem, some easy to implement solution may be widely adopted and deployed faster than usually does others solutions and standards.
If this hurts the idea that a project needs to be conducted with rigour, we can also say that an immediate solution to the spam problem, maybe intermediate, must be put into practice soon.
Regards
Jose-Marcio
Claus Assmann wrote:
Is there any chance that the authors of the varies "RMX" proposals work together on a common draft that at least defines the entries in DNS and their semantics? I want to add support for this into a common MTA, but I don't want to deal with many different kinds of DNS entries. I prefer a solution that doesn't require changes to DNS servers/resolvers, i.e., which uses existing RRs (like DRIP does) and which minimizes the number of required DNS lookups. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg_______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ Tel. :(33) 01.40.51.93.41 Ecole des Mines de Paris http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr 60, bd Saint Michel http://www.ensmp.fr/~martins 75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06 mailto:Jose-Marcio.Martins@ensmp.fr _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg