Re: RE: [Asrg] 4 Forwarding, Consent frameworks and interest registration

["Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com>]

> Jonathan describes the situation perfectly. Jsmith (in my example) does
> exactly what Jonathan outlined. So the scenario goes that jsmith the
> subscriber says please mail this to my friend Chris.
> 
> 
> Now looking at this from all points of view. It is in the economic
> interest of the magazine to make sure that I have every opportunity to
> subscribe and not just freeload on jsmith's subscription. It is in
> jsmith's interest to keep sending me the articles (because they give us
> something to talk about when hoisting a pint)m it is in my interest
> because I am learning about something or seeing a point of view that I
> have never had before.
> So in some sense, I think that the piece should come jointly from the
> magazine and jsmith. I have a consent agreement with jsmith, and this
> item should be under that agreement. Of course getting the publications
> to buy off is a different issue. I think it is probably quite important
> that the consent agreement not hop from jsmith to the magazine. Just
> because jsmith has emailed me something under our agreement does not
> give the 3rd party license in any sense to use that agreement for
> anything at all. (I suspect that some of the cleverer people in this
> group can come up with great counter examples.)
> 

But you *are* asking that jsmith be allowed to give your consent to a third
party. The only easy way of doing this that I can see is to employ a
special email address only for your interaction with jsmith. jsmith can
then give this to whoever they like. I daresay other kinds of consent
tokens might be useful - but they'd require that the publisher (in this
case) knew what to do with them. That would be the publishers problem.










--

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg