At 01:23 PM 11/17/2003, Alan DeKok wrote:
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> wrote: > LMAP is clearly not going to eliminate all spam, why is it important then? > The answer is that it will eliminate the worst types of spam, impersonation > spam. I'm starting work on an SMTP evaluation document. It will discuss why spam is worse in SMTP than any other protocol.
Which protocols are you comparing it to? Mark
The goal of the document is to give us concrete reasons as to why spam is such a problem in SMTP. Once we know that, we will then know why certain proposals are useful, and what impact they have on spam, and on non-spam uses of SMTP. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg