[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Proposed Changes for Document



Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>:
> Historically all discussions on the definition of spam in the group have 
> not come to a fruitful conclusion. According to the technical 
> considerations document, the term "unsolicited bulk email" is used as a 
> working definition. See the following:
> 	http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-02.txt
> http://www.opengroup.org/messaging/public/oct-2003/spam/shafranovich.pdf 
> (sections 2.1-2.3)

In case there is any doubt in the matter, I am fully behind this definition and
have no desire to take us down terminological black holes.  My glossary-writing
was intended to support it, not dispute it.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg