[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Asrg] 3. Requirements - Proposed Changes for Document
Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>:
> Historically all discussions on the definition of spam in the group have
> not come to a fruitful conclusion. According to the technical
> considerations document, the term "unsolicited bulk email" is used as a
> working definition. See the following:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-spam-techconsider-02.txt
> http://www.opengroup.org/messaging/public/oct-2003/spam/shafranovich.pdf
> (sections 2.1-2.3)
In case there is any doubt in the matter, I am fully behind this definition and
have no desire to take us down terminological black holes. My glossary-writing
was intended to support it, not dispute it.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg