RE: [Asrg] 6. Propsals -- Labeling recommendations for the FTC

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>]

If keywords are in a header then it really does not matter what language
they are in.

If we are encoding keywords into subject lines the result is liable to be
fragile. But even here there is a precedent, RE, FWD, WAS


BTW note that PICS and P3P are probably the least successful web protocols
deployment wise.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric S. Raymond [mailto:esr@thyrsus.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:46 AM
> To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
> Cc: Eric S. Raymond; ASRG
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] 6. Propsals -- Labeling recommendations 
> for the FTC
> 
> 
> Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>:
> > Eric,
> > 
> > i18n/l10n.
> > 
> > Eric
> 
> I thought about it.
> 
> Yes, the keywords and ADV are English.  There are 4, count 
> 'em 4 tokens;
> with a vocabulary that small, the benefits of 
> internationalization are 
> extremely dubious compared to the added complexity.
> 
> I'll add a 'graph about this to the Rationale.
> -- 
> 		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
> 

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg