Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)

["Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>]

Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>:
> I think the bill needs to be read carefully, did the ADV convention ever
> make it to Internet standard? I suspect it was experimental.
 
I have read the bill carefully.  

> There are various types of commercial material:
> 
> 1) Advert, Unsolicited, no prior business relationship, cold calling
> 2) Advert, Prior business relationship
> 3) Advert, Solicited,
> 4) Account, presumably solicited
> 5) Report of transaction, invoice etc.
> 
> The point being that it is vital to allow types 4 and 5 through and may be
> pretty important to allow type 3 through.

Yes.  These are the categories CAN-SPAM dsecribes as "transactional and 
relationship" mail.  They are explicitly exempted from the labeling
requirement.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg