Re: [Asrg] 6. Propsals -- Labeling recommendations for the FTC

["Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com>]

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:45:46AM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>:
> > Eric,
> > 
> > i18n/l10n.
> > 
> > Eric
> 
> I thought about it.
> 
> Yes, the keywords and ADV are English.  There are 4, count 'em 4 tokens;
> with a vocabulary that small, the benefits of internationalization are 
> extremely dubious compared to the added complexity.

Would "ADV" matching be done before or after any charset conversion?

Also, would it be worth a sentence somewhere that says that the
existence of this I-D (or RFC) in no way endorses any particular
approach (I'm specifically thinking of the implication that suddenly
opt-out has been sanctified).

While I am here: is there a current practice of any sort for a
header that identifies the end-user filter program that the message
has passed through?  e.g.   "X-Filtered-By:  spamanoid version 3.2" ?
I seem to recall seeing one once, but haven't been able to locate it.

Yours,
-mm-

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg