Brett Watson <famous-asrg@nutters.org>:
I don't have any fundamental objection to the use of the "keywords"
field for this purpose, but I think that any special
universally-meaningful keywords which are introduced should be given
their own "namespace", purely out of respect for the original intent
of the field.
This just pushes the problem back a level. How do you know you won't
collide with someone else's namerspace grab? :-)
I think the message quoting Jacob Palme stated pretty clearly that for
these purposes a new header is needed.