[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, <esr@thyrsus.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
From: "Chris" <rebel@rebel.com.au>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:15:48 +1030
Cc: "'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'" <brunner@nic-naa.net>, "Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com>, "ASRG" <asrg@ietf.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E0111321E@mou1wnexm02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org

>
> What would make the scheme more robust is being able to identify the
> transactional and permission based message empirically. So a spam filter
> knows to expect that they will come from a small number of senders
> authorized for that express purpose.
>
> 		Phill
>


Can I enquire as to whom you work for, you seem to have a purpose in your
comments



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
Next by Date: RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
Next by thread: RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread