RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)

["Chris" <asrg@rebel.com.au>]

> It shouldn't be too difficult to find out. Look at my email address.
> I am the Principal Scientist.

Phill I didnt see that. sorry (I have to click on properties to get at it)

No wonder you are following your line

Verisign/Microsoft has a lot of vested interest in this field

I am led to believe a lot of effort was spent on creating a "certificate"
system for e-mail

Chris



> -----Original Message-----
> From: asrg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:asrg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: 'Chris'; Hallam-Baker, Phillip; esr@thyrsus.com
> Cc: 'Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine'; Jon Kyme; ASRG
> Subject: RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labelling (?)
>
>
> > > What would make the scheme more robust is being able to identify the
> > > transactional and permission based message empirically. So
> > a spam filter
> > > knows to expect that they will come from a small number of senders
> > > authorized for that express purpose.
> > >
> > > 		Phill
> > >
> >
> >
> > Can I enquire as to whom you work for, you seem to have a
> > purpose in your comments
>
> 		Phill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg