RE: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - depracate all list/bulk mailing and changeto RSS

["Chris" <asrg@rebel.com.au>]

>
> The good part of pull, as far as I'm concerned, is that
> control rests with the end user, not the marketer.  The bad part of
> pull, as far as the marketer is concerned, is that control rests with
> the end user, not the marketer.
>

I can agree with you on this one.

Regards
Chris



> -----Original Message-----
> From: asrg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:asrg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Walter Dnes
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:51 PM
> To: ASRG list
> Subject: Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - depracate all list/bulk mailing and
> changeto RSS
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:23:50PM -0500, Yakov Shafranovich wrote
>
> > >RSS feeds have a long way to go before legitimate email publishers
> > >(such as all of my company's clients - member-based organizations like
> > >AFL-CIO,  Public Broadcasting System, American Red Cross - would be
> > >willing to abandon push email for pull news aggregators.
> >
> > Would email publishers be willing to pursue the "pull" approach to the
> > extend that they are willing to sit down and work out the different
> > issues involved? Or is "pull" currently a "non-starter" in those
> > communities?
> --
> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
> Email users are divided into two classes;
> 1) Those who have effective spam-blocking
> 2) Those who wish they did
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> Asrg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg