Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labeling - FTC response

["Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com>]

> 
> BTW, I was thinking about your comments and those by Jon about
> no-soliciting generating implied consent (e.g., if I don't
> have a no shooting shirt on you can shoot me).  I'm not sure
> I agree.  With no trespassing signs, at least out here in the
> forest where I live, the sign tells you not to go on a specific
> piece of property.

Out in our neck of the woods one has to post no trespassing/
no hunting signs, else hunting is implicitly permitted.  But
that's really neither here nor there.  Personally I would like
something (perhaps in the introduction) saying that the mere
presence of this document is in no way to be taken as an endorsement
of opt-out unsolicited bulk email.

mm

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg