Re: [Asrg] 6. Proposals - Legal - Subject labeling - FTC response

["Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>]

Carl Malamud <carl@media.org>:
> But, I don't think we should do that.  We can specify protocol
> mechanisms and even header fields as containers, but why not let the
> legislators and the ftc do their labels themselves?  After all,
> Korea or the EU or Bangladesh may very well have different labels.
> I'd much specify a mechanism and let policy people make policy.

As I said in private mail, if that's what you want you should write
the draft that way.  The way it's worded now it looks like you're pushing the
MAPS-UBE definition, which is flawed in part 3.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg