Re: [Asrg] Re: 6. Proposals: LMAP proposals

["Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>]

Matthew Elvey <matthew@elvey.com> wrote:
> And I forgot - of course MAIL FROM: <> needs to be mentioned as a 
> special case.

  Yes, I'll add that.

> Something like this is needed:
> "Email submitted to a secondary MX for relay to the primary MX MUST 
> somehow have the LMAP policy of the domain it claims to be from queried 
> and applied." .  If only the secondary receiving the email will  have 
> enough information, then this could be said more simply.
> Should this be added to one of the LMAP draft documents?

  I'll add it to the discussion draft.

> I just thought of another possible problem with LMAP.  If a spammer 
> using direct-to-MX spamware sends email to me, from me, (as I'd bet they 
> regularly do) it may not be caught by LMAP.

  That's a local configuration issue.

  Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg