Hector Santos wrote: [..]
I presumed you are privy to any time line information? Yahoo does say early 2004.
[..] Nope, I am just as clueless about the time line as everyone else is. [..]
No "KEY" from a YAHOO return path message:
What steps should a SMTP server take?
Or is what YAHOO is telling the world that starting in 2004, any message
that does not have a private key, should not be trusted? Plain and simple?
Then as you mentioned, we are left with possible forgery issues.
[..]Since this proposal signs messages themselves that are transfered within the DATA command, this cannot be done before the DATA command. Therefore, unlike LMAP proposals it cannot be used at the MAIL FROM point.The key to any successful technology is to tell the SMTP receiver not to take any further action or minimum action on validating a transaction and it needs to be done before DATA is received.