Dave Crocker wrote:
Alan,Would it be something along the lines of the following?:
AD> Even as rough as it is, I feel very positive about it. It gives a
AD> number of *concrete* reasons as to why spam is worse in SMTP than in
AD> any other protocol. It allows us to classify the anti-spam measures,
An exercise like the one you are doing can be very useful.
Let me strongly encourage you to re-cast the bulk of your document
into non-technical issues, first. That is, discuss messaging and a
human process, without concern for whether it is paper mail, email, or
whatever. As you offer criticisms of the human communication modes
available for Internet mail, compare whether they differ from the
modes available for other messaging.
The underlying problem is a human one and we need to understand it before changing the technology. The reasons why spam is being sent, and is profitable, are human reasons which need to be addressed.When you suggest superior modes of operation, discuss them in terms of the human communication first, and the technical aspects second. After we have some consensus about these issues, in terms of human communication, it will then be reasonable to see what changes are needed to the technology.