[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols

To: "ASRG" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
From: "Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:37:55 +0000
Cc: "John R. Levine" <asrg@johnlevine.com>
In-reply-to: <20031223045139.20440.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org

> Why don't we see much
>instant message spam (at least relative to e-mail spam)?  Is it that
>the popular IM systems are all closed with a central control point?
>


Nice little article by David McGuire here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A36039-2003Nov13






--

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
  - From: John R. Levine

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Previous by thread: [Asrg] 1. Inventory of Problems - Email vs. IM
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: [1] Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread