[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols

To: Philip Miller <millenix@zemos.net>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
From: irtf-chair@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:47:50 -0800
Cc: "John R. Levine" <asrg@johnlevine.com>, asrg@ietf.org, Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:46:45 EST.
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org

> What is this about, and why has none of it been mentioned on the list 
> before? I'd imagine that a complete rewrite of the group's charter is 
> probably something that should be a public process.

My interpretation of RFC 2014 is that chartering and rechartering are
ultimately done at the IRTF chair's discretion, with the IAB's consent.
It is in fact generally not a public process.

		Vern

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
  - From: Philip Miller

Prev by Date: [Asrg] Re: Forgery in SMTP
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Previous by thread: [Asrg] 0. General- useful ideas from other areas of research.
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread