[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols

To: "ASRG" <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
From: "Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:55:23 +0000
In-reply-to: <200312310809.hBV895nm022387@jaguar.icir.org>
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org

>> The relevant text from RFC 2014 is from section 2.2, "Charter":
>
>


This is the fascinating "self-amendment" question - interested readers
should see here:
http://www.nomic.net/

Best wishes (for what many will be calling the New Year) to you all,
JK









--

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
  - From: Vern Paxson

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPAM is worse in SMTP than in other protocols
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread