Re: [Asrg] Meaningless words in spams

[Joe Marshall <jrm at ccs.neu.edu>]

Eugene Crosser <crosser@rol.ru> writes:

> On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 13:45, Matt Schneider wrote:
>> Yes, it's a "hash buster" to make each spam slightly different than each 
>> other, so they can get around filters i.e. Brightmail.
>> 
>> - Matt
>
> Also, the maningful but unrelated text, as I understand, is a way to get
> through Bayesian filters...

The statistics of the pile of words at the end makes it less likely to
defeat Bayesian filters.


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg