[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Asrg] 3. SMTP Session/Message Verification - competitive methods

To: ASRG <asrg at ietf.org>
Subject: [Asrg] 3. SMTP Session/Message Verification - competitive methods
From: "Za'mbori, Zolta'n" <zamboriz at axelero.hu>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:22:00 +0100
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

I think there will be implemented some competitive SMTP level session/message/address verification methods.

Cooperativity between the different anti-worm, anti-forgery, anti-spam methods is a question for me.

For example implementing more than one SMTP session verification method into an MX is lead to a problem: how to select the proper method?

z2

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] 3. SMTP Session/Message Verification - competitive methods
  - From: David Nicol

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] 1c. Analysis of Spam - biological approach
Next by Date: [Asrg] 3b. SMTP Session Verification - MSFT's Caller ID proposal posted
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Patrik Fältström 's mailflow chart
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] 3. SMTP Session/Message Verification - competitive methods
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread