[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-00

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-00
From: Matt Sergeant <msergeant at startechgroup.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 21:14:45 +0100 (BST)
Cc: "'Yakov Shafranovich'" <research at solidmatrix.com>, ASRG list <asrg at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <C6DDA43B91BFDA49AA2F1E473732113E5DBC2E@mou1wnexm05.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>,<mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin at ietf.org

On Wed, 5 May 2004, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

> The only point I can see in a BCP for blacklists is if it is going
> to reduce the problems being caused by blacklists. The consensus here
> seems to be that blacklists never create any problems.

I fail to see how you reached that conclusion. The BCP came about *purely*
because the authors saw problems in certain practices of certain DNSBLs.

Matt.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

References:
- RE: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-00
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] RE: 2a. Blacklists, collateral damage and anonymity
Next by Date: RE: [Asrg] RE: 2a. Blacklists, collateral damage and anonymity
Previous by thread: RE: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-00
Next by thread: RE: [Asrg] draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-00
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread