[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Asrg] Spam and IPv6

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: [Asrg] Spam and IPv6
From: Jim Witte <jswitte at bloomington.in.us>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 15:45:15 -0500
List-archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: asrg-admin at ietf.org

Does IPv6 add anything to the spam puzzle? Because with IPv6, the address space is so big that every person and his dog on Earth could potentially have a separate address. Would that make tracking/controlling stuff easier?

Jim


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] Spam and IPv6
  - From: Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam and IPv6
  - From: David Maxwell

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] 3. Proof-of-work analysis
Next by Date: [Asrg] Re: Spam send/receive ratio
Previous by thread: [Asrg] [ASR] 0 -General Viruses now rival spam for inbox space
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Spam and IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread