Re: [Asrg] E-mail Postmarks

[William Leibzon <william at completewhois.com>]

On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Eric A. Hall wrote:

> Separately, it seems like there are lots of folks that think domain-wide
> sigs are a good idea, and lots of ideas being thrown around, and I'm
> starting to think that it might be a good idea to take a step back and
> work on a requirements document of some kind. Might want to peel off a
> separate list to try and nail some of these issues down.

I agree, there seem to be nunber of proposals and ideas around that involve
cryptographic verification of mail path with signatures introduced by MTAs 
and they seem to take now large porition of discussion on ASRG main list.
It might be better if we create new ASRG subgroup to study these issues
futher and potentially work on requirements or just for discussion and
evaluation of various proposals.

---
William Leibzon
william at completewhois.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg