[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.)

To: asrg at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.)
From: SM <sm at resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:04:57 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=; b=I/ /bQdgOUEIa5S2caR1V3Cz9ma/Q0Gli22Bg/QcMJnTAMmnIzo0J2oEZxc104y+t
In-reply-to: <20040729035910.GA13451@zardoc.esmtp.org>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <16648.7496.341914.43827@world.std.com> <4108504F.3000402@zemos.net> <16648.24687.123840.810282@world.std.com> <200407290300.XAA02349@Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> <16648.28311.472916.772196@world.std.com> <20040729035910.GA13451@zardoc.esmtp.org>
Sender: asrg-bounces at ietf.org

Hello,
At 20:59 28-07-2004, Claus Assmann wrote:

- "phishing" attacks for well-known senders are harder (this is
  something financial companies really like).

Such attacks would be harder only if the From: header is verified against the Return-path.

Regards, -sm


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.)
  - From: Barry Shein

References:
- Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
  - From: Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
  - From: Philip Miller
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
  - From: Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
  - From: Barry Shein
- [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.)
  - From: Claus Assmann

Prev by Date: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?
Next by Date: Re: [Asrg] Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
Previous by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.)
Next by thread: Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF? (was: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread