[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Barry Shein wrote:
> On July 29, 2004 at 21:36 david at vex.net (David Maxwell) wrote:
> > Yes, I see that you already replied in the threads I was thinking of,
> > and said they were lies then.
>
> I don't remember saying anything was a "lie", just folklore of
> suspicious origin and asked if there was anything more factual
> available.
See:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg/current/msg04709.html
Tue, 13 May 2003 16:57:01 -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
> The whole article seems to be woven together lies.
--
David Maxwell, david at vex.net|david at maxwell.net -->
Net Musing #5: Redundancy in a network doesn't mean two of everything and
half the staff to run it.
- Tomas T. Peiser, CET
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- References:
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.
- Re: [Asrg] Re: Anti-spam laws do work, FYI. There's proof.