Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?

[Seth Breidbart <sethb at panix.com>]

rogerk at queernet.org wrote:
> Quoting Seth Breidbart <sethb at panix.com>:
>> Can informed consent be based on "This is the policy here.  If you
>> don't like it, quit."?
>>
>> Can it be based on "This is the way this MSP works.  If you don't like
>> it, use another MSP."?
. . .
> And, of course, this is big enough a change that no existing user should be
> compelled to be grandfathered into it.

That is, you claim that an existing customer or employee should have
the ability to force its provider or employer to continue doing what
it used to?  Who gets to pay whatever costs that imposes?  Those costs
can be quite large if they include the ability to determine on a
per-user basis whether spam will be filtered, in addition to the
relatively smaller costs imposed by not filtering.

Seth


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg