Re: [Asrg] Re: Why SPF?

[rogerk at queernet.org]

Quoting Seth Breidbart <sethb at panix.com>:
> That is, you claim that an existing customer or employee should have
> the ability to force its provider or employer to continue doing what
> it used to?

Employee?  Of course not.  Customer?  Of course.  They're customers.

When a change is this significant, sure, at least as a starting point.  If
you're going to inconvenience them by changing the rules in so substantial a
way, at least a discussion of compensation is in order.

> Who gets to pay whatever costs that imposes?  Those costs
> can be quite large if they include the ability to determine on a
> per-user basis whether spam will be filtered, in addition to the
> relatively smaller costs imposed by not filtering.

Move them to a server that observes the current rules.  Work, yes, but not
grossly so.  That's just one option, of course.

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg